Allowed

Abhishek v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC11 Jan 2024BAIL APPLN./4051/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in an FIR alleging mischief and damage. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bond and comply with investigation requirements.

What did the court decide?

Direction to join investigation, provide mobile number, not leave the country without permission, subject to furnishing a bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety.

Abhishek Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi — Anticipatory Bail | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~14

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 4051/2023

¶4

ABHISHEK ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Vishesh Varma, Mr. Ashwani Mathur, Mr. Anuj Panwar and Mr. Hitik Bansal, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R % 11.01.2024

¶10

An application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 („Cr.P.C.‟) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 692/2023 under Sections 308/341/34 IPC registered at P.S. : Dayalpur.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused Nakul has already been admitted to anticipatory bail by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 06.12.2023, which is not disputed by learned APP for the State.

¶12

Learned APP for the State submits that petitioner has already joined the investigation and is not required for the purpose of any custodial interrogation.

¶13

In the facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest, petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 12:47:46

¶15

the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer/SHO concerned and subject to the following conditions :

¶16

(i) The petitioner is directed to join the investigation, as and when required;

¶17

(ii) The petitioner shall provide his mobile number to the Investigating Officer (IO) / SHO concerned; and

¶18

(iii) The petitioner shall not leave the country without prior permission of the learned Trial Court.

¶19

Application is accordingly disposed of.

¶20

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.

¶21

JANUARY 11, 2024/ R

¶22

Abhishek v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhishek v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amitabh Saxena Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Ajay Kumar Vs Uma

Anand Kumar & Ors. Vs State of NCT Delhi & Ors.

Ravinder Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Mr Rishi Arora & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Rajeev Kumar Vs the State of NCT of Delhi