Justice Anish Dayal dismissed a criminal writ petition as withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioner, with liberty to file afresh at a later date.
Liberty granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh at a later point of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
TARUN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate for petitioner with Mr. Lavish Chhikara, Mr. Gopesh Jindal, Mr. Diksha Dharia and Mr. Turang Pandit, Advocates. versus
STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Sh. Amol Sinha, ASC for State along with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Advocates with Insp. Pramod Kr. PS Mayur Vihar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 13.09.2024
ANISH DAYAL, J
SEPTEMBER 13, 2024/RK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:33:02
Tarun Kumar
State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
