Allowed

Sabir Ali & Ors. v. State Govt NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC11 Sept 2024W.P.(CRL)/2815/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC regarding matrimonial disputes. The court observed that the parties had amicably settled their differences and were living together, holding that no useful purpose would be served in continuing the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 150/2021 and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom were quashed.

Sabir Ali & Ors. Vs State Govt NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~65

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 2815/2024

¶4

SABIR ALI & ORS. .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Counsel(Appearance not given)

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE GOVT NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for the State

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 11.09.2024

¶12

The Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C., 1973’) has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, seeking quashing of the FIR No. 150/2021 for the offences under Section 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC, 1860’) registered at Police Station Shahbad Dairy.

¶13

Issue notice.

¶14

Learned ASC appearing on advance notice, accepts notice on behalf of the State.

¶15

Brief facts of the case are that the marriage was solemnized between petitioner No. 1/husband and respondent No. 2/wife on 14.04.2018 according to the Muslim rites and ceremonies and a male child was born out of the said wedlock.

¶16

It is stated that the petitioner No. 1 and the respondent No. 2 have amicably settled all the disputes and differences between them before the

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:17:41

¶18

Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini and agreed to reside happily together and since then they have been living together.

¶19

The parties are present before this Court in-person today, and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer concerned. 7. The present petition has been signed by the petitioner and is supported by his affidavit. The parties are living together happily and without any pressure and coercion.

¶20

Today, the respondent No. 2/wife, who is present in the Court, states that she has no objection if the FIR is quashed.

¶21

In view of the above facts that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will and without any coercion and also the fact that the present matter is a family matter, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. Hence, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto.

¶22

Moreover, there is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

¶23

Accordingly, FIR No. 150/2021 for the offences under Section 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC, 1860’) registered at Police Station Shahbad Dairy and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. 12. The Petition stands disposed of.

¶24

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J

¶25

SEPTEMBER 11, 2024/PT

¶26

Sabir Ali & Ors. v. State Govt NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sabir Ali & Ors. v. State Govt NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Shankar and Ors. Vs State Gnct of Delhi and Ors.

Naresh Mohan Singla Vs Smt Ranjana Bhatia

Sh. Abhishek Verma Alias Abhishek Kumar Verma and Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Bhupinder Singh Vs the State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

Firoz Saifi @ Mohd. Asif & Anr. Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.

Eti Tiwari Vs the State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Janak Raj Dhami Vs the Joint Commissioner of Police Licensing Unit, New Delhi

Ankit Garg Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Hari Shankar and Ors. Vs State Gnct of Delhi and Ors.

Karan Singh Vs State of Nct, Delhi & Anr.

Heaven Lounge Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs State of Gnctd & Anr.

Mr.Manu Garg Vs Pritish Aggarwal

Sanjay Tyagi Vs State through SHO Police Station South Vasant Kunj

Mohd Umar Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.