Petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of FIR; petitioner sought withdrawal, which was granted, resulting in dismissal as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~69
TARIQ AHMAD SHEIKH .....Petitioner
Through: Appearance not given.
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel and Mr.Abhinav Kr Arya, Advocate with SI Rajesh and SI Himanshu.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R % 05.11.2024
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the instant petition.
Leave granted.
Accordingly, the instant petition along with pending application(s), if any, is dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
NOVEMBER 5, 2024 Rk/sm
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:27:05
Tariq Ahmad Sheikh
The State of NCT of Delhi
Chandra Dhari Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
