Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to approach the Trial Court later. The court granted the leave and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Leave to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to take contentions before the Trial Court later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
SATISH MEHTA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr.__, Advocate (Appearance not given)
versus
THE STATE GNCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with Ms.Priyam Agrawal, Advocate alongwith SI Jay Prakash, P.S. Inderpuri
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH O R D E R % 22.10.2024
Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the State submitted that status report has already been filed, however, the same is not on record. He has handed over the copy of the status report during the course of the proceedings and the same is taken on record.
At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to take his contentions before the learned Trial Court at an appropriate stage.
Leave granted.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
OCTOBER 22, 2024 Dy/ryp Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/10/2024 at 12:20:14
Satish Mehta
The State GNCT of Delhi
Chandra Dhar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
