Two connected petitions seeking protection against coercive action; counsel for the petitioners sought withdrawal after the State's status report indicated no such apprehension, and the Court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn without any concession from the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~51 & 52
AJAY KUMAR @AJAY RANA
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. R.K. Tarun, Ms. Aditi Shivadhatri, Advocates. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for State with Ms. Charu Sharma, Mr. Arjit Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Vats and Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Advocates. with SI Naveen and SI S.K Jha, PS: Burari, Delhi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 21.10.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:55:27
ANISH DAYAL, J
OCTOBER 21, 2024/RK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:55:27
Kishan Kumar @ Kishan Pehlwan
State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Rana
State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
