Surinder Kaur v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of an FIR and transfer to Mumbai. Court observed the FIR was already quashed by a coordinate bench in 2014, making the present petition infructuous.
What did the court decide?
Petition held infructuous due to prior quashing order; disposed accordingly.
What the court decided
$~R-16
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 2310/2010
SURINDER KAUR .....Petitioner Through: None.
versus
STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr.Mukesh Kumar, APP for State with SI Mamta, PS Dwarka Sector-23
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R % 23.08.2024
- None appears on behalf of the petitioner as well as respondent no. 2. 2. The present petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking the following prayers:
“a) To issue an appropriate direction/order quashing of the FIR No. 870/2006 dated 14.10.2006 registered at P.S. South West, Dwarka, New Delhi by the Respondent No.2, against the Petitioner.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present petition for quashing of FIR under Section 482 CrPC is maintainable after a prior order quashing the same FIR.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Surinder Kaur
- respondent
State of NCT of Delhi
Coram
Amit Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court