The petitioner's counsel submitted that the matter was settled and instructed to withdraw the petition. The High Court of Delhi disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn.
petition disposed of as withdrawn
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
Through: Mr. Firoz, Adv.(VC)
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC for State with Mr.Abhinav Kr. Arya, Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs with SI Sanjeet Rathi, P.S. Malviya Nagar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has already been settled between the parties, and he has received instructions not to pursue the present petition.
In view of the above, the present petition along with pending applications if any, be disposed of as withdrawn.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
DECEMBER 12, 2024
Pallavi/NA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/12/2024 at 13:09:30
SMT GULFSA KHATOOON
ANR.
STATE NCT OF DELHI
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
