The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn along with the pending application.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~42
Through: Ms.Mreganka Kukreja, Advocate
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for State with Ms.Charu Sharma, Mr.Arjit Sharma and Mr.Nikunj Bindal, Advocates Mr.Devrat Yadav and Mr.Anil Sonu, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R
% 11.12.2024
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
DECEMBER 11, 2024 na
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 11:49:25
Muneeb Hussain Gattoo
State (NCT of Delhi)
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
