Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR registered for stalking and insulting the modesty of respondent No.2 on the basis of a settlement deed. The complainant confirmed voluntary settlement and no objection to quashing. The court quashed the FIR and consequent proceedings, subject to each petitioner paying Rs.10,000 as cost to the complainant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
Through: Mr. Amar Singh, Advocate with petitioners in person
STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Amol Sinha, ASC for State with Mr.Kshitiz Garg, Mr.Ashvini Kumar and Ms.Chavi Lazarus, Advocates with SI Vikas Respondent No.2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/10/2024 at 12:32:16
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
SEPTEMBER 25, 2024/ na
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/10/2024 at 12:32:16
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an FIR for offences under Sections 354A/354D/509/34 IPC should be quashed following amicable settlement between the parties.
4 provisions across 1 enactments
Imran Khan & Anr.
State
Respondent No.2 (complainant)
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
