Petition dismissed as not pressed after respondent no. 2's counsel stated that direction in the ASJ order dated 22 February 2023, requiring deposit of Rs. 75 Lakhs by FDR with the court concerned, had been complied with within time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
SULEKH MALIK .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manish Vashisht, Senior Advocate.
versus
STATE OFNCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State. Mr. Yogesh Kumar Dahiya, Advocate for R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Mr. Yogesh Kumar Dahiya, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2, on instructions, submitted at bar that the direction no. “a” passed by the learned ASJ in impugned order dated 22nd February, 2023 has already been complied with within time and Rs. 75 Lakhs, in the form of FDR, has been deposited with the Court concerned.
Mr. Manish Vashist, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that in view of the statement made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2, he does not wish to press the instant petition at this stage.
Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
Taking into consideration the statement given by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2 at bar, on instructions, this
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 11:37:11
Court has no occasion to disbelieve the said statement.
The learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has fairly conceded to the statement given by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2 by stating that he does not wish to press the instant petition on merits at this stage.
Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as not pressed.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J
OCTOBER 15, 2024 rk/ryp
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 11:37:11
Sulekh Malik
State of NCT of Delhi
Respondent No. 2 (unnamed)
Chandra Dhari Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
