Petitioners sought leave to withdraw their writ petition without prejudice to their rights; the court granted the prayer and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to petitioners' rights and contentions remaining unaffected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~39
Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, Ms. Shelly Dixit, Ms. Anushka Bhalla, Advocates.
versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC (Crl.) for the State with SI Meenu Bhan PS Karol Bagh, New Delhi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
DECEMBER 12, 2024/ rd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 11:49:16
Tapan Sasmal & Ors.
State (Govt. of NCT) & Ors.
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
