Prisoner sought two-month parole for house repairs; State reported construction already complete. Court found no ground for parole, disposed of petition but allowed fresh parole application to be decided within a month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
VINOD KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Baliyan, Advocate (DHCLSC) & Ms. Jyoti Garg, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC, Crl. with Mr Sangeet Sibou, Advocate for State. Insp. Yogendra Kumar, PS Punjabi Bagh, Delhi.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 13.09.2024
CRL.M.A. 27860/2024
W.P.(CRL) 1544/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:36:39
read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking direction to the respondent to release him on Parole for a period of two months for getting his house repaired and in the meantime for arranging alternate accommodation for his family members.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
SEPTEMBER 13, 2024 S.Sharma
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 03:36:39
1 issue framed by the court
Was the petitioner entitled to parole for two months for house repair and arranging alternate accommodation when construction was already complete?
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Vinod Kumar
State of NCT of Delhi
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
