Dismissed
Sunita v. Dharmendra Gautam
Delhi HCCRL.L.P./144/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Leave petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~21
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.L.P. 144/2019 & CRL.M.A. 3576/2019
¶4
SUNITA ..... Petitioner
¶5
Through: None.
¶6
versus
¶7
DHARMENDRA GAUTAM ..... Respondent Through: None.
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 15.05.2024
¶9
- None appears for the petitioner. None had appeared for the petitioner on earlier occasion i.e. on 15th January, 2024 and 6th October, 2023 as well.
¶10
- It is apparent that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition.
¶11
- Dismissed for non-prosecution.
¶12
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sunita
- respondent
Dharmendra Gautam
Coram
AI extract
Amit Mahajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court