Allowed

Suraj v. the State

Delhi HC14 May 2024BAIL APPLN./1285/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order corrects a clerical error in a previous bail order where the wrong FIR number was cited. The court directs the corrected paragraph and grants regular bail to the applicant in FIR No. 392/2020, subject to standard conditions including personal bond and restrictions on tampering with evidence or leaving the country.

What did the court decide?

Paragraph 21 of the order dated 14.05.2024 was corrected to reflect the correct FIR number, and regular bail was granted.

Suraj Vs the State — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~102

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

BAIL APPLN. 1285/2024 SURAJ ..... Applicant Through: versus THE STATE ..... Respondent

¶4

Through:

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN O R D E R % 20.05.2024

¶6

The mater is placed on an office note. It is pointed out that the FIR No. 392/2020 has been wrongly referred as FIR No. 102/2016 in paragraph No. 21 of the order dated 14.05.2024.

¶7

In view of the above, paragraph No. 21 of the order dated

¶8

14.05.2024 is directed to be read as under:

¶9

“ 21. Without commenting further on the merits of the present case and keeping in mind the facts and circumstances of the case, I am satisfied that the applicant has made out a case for grant of regular bail. The applicant is, therefore, directed to be released on bail in FIR no 392/2020 on furnishing a personal bond for a sum of ₹25,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/ Duty Metropolitan Magistrate, subject to the following conditions:

¶10

a. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case or tamper with the evidence of the case, in any manner whatsoever;

¶11

b. The applicant shall under no circumstance leave the country without the permission of the learned Trial Court;

¶12

c. He shall appear before the learned Trial Court

¶13

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2024 at 11:51:25

¶14

on every date of hearing;

¶15

d. He shall, upon his release, provide his address details where he would be residing after his release and shall not change the address without informing the concerned IO/ SHO;

¶16

e. He shall, upon his release, give his mobile number to the concerned IO/SHO and shall keep his mobile phone switched on at all times”.

¶17

No further orders are required to be passed.

¶18

AMIT MAHAJAN, J

¶19

MAY 20, 2024 “SK”

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2024 at 11:51:25

Suraj v. the State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suraj v. the State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharat Bhushan Vs State & Anr.

Narender @ Bajrang Vs State NCT of Delhi

Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Vs Surender Kumar Verma

Ayush & Anr. Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Vinay Pratap @Shyamveer through Parokar Mahendra Vs the State NCT of Delhi

Ram Kumar Sharma & Ors. Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) through SHO Ps Shahdara & Anr.