Petitioner sought consolidation of proceedings and quashing of FIRs regarding alleged dues. After Respondent 2 (Bajaj Finance) confirmed account settlement and complaint withdrawal, the court declared the petition infructuous and disposed of the matter.
Petition rendered infructuous and disposed of along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
POONAM KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sandeep Joshi, Advocate.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Advocates.
Mr. Rajat Katyal, Advocate for R2. Mr. Dhananjay Sud, Advocate for R3 along with Mr. Sanjay Gupta, RP in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R % 15.05.2024
“a) Pass an order directing consolidation of all pending proceedings pending before different Metropolitan Magistrates at Dwarka Court, Dwarka, New Delhi (as detailed in ANNEXURE-P1);
b) Pass an order for calling of all records of the pending proceedings before this Hon'ble Court;
c) Pass an interim order in the nature of Writ of Certiorari or an order or direction for stay of all pending proceedings as initiated by the Respondent No.2 against the petitioner before the Metropolitan Magistrates at Dwarka, New Delhi;
d) Pass a Writ of Certiorari and/or prohibition and/or direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and/or prohibition directing the Respondent Bank to not to further misuse ECS mandate given by the Petitioner for recovery of its alleged dues;
W.P.(CRL) 1375/2022 page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:54:57
e) A Writ in nature of Prohibition and/ or Certiorari thereby directing the Respondent Bank not to take any further steps against the Petitioner for recovery if its alleged dues during pendency of this present Writ;
f) Pass an order thereby quashing all the pending proceeding and Pass a Writ of certiorari or prohibition or a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari and / or prohibition and/or any other appropriate writ, directing to quash the proceeding filed by the Respondent No.2 against the Petitioner being detailed under ANNEXURE – P1.”
JYOTI SINGH, J
MAY 15, 2024/ DU
W.P.(CRL) 1375/2022
page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:54:57
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition requires any further order given the settlement of the bank account.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Poonam Kumar
Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors
Bajaj Finance Limited
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
