Writ petition seeking expedited hearing of a pending criminal case was disposed of by direction for expeditious proceedings by the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate.
Direction for expedited hearing and conclusion of the pending criminal case before the Metropolitan Magistrate, South, Saket Court, Delhi.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
SANJEEV KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Petitioner in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Amicus Curiae Mr. Hritik Chaudhary, Mr. Sahil Agarwal and Mr. Rajesh Singh, Advs. Mr. Aman Usman, APP. Inspector Surender, SI Dharam Singh. PS Hauz Khas.
CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/11/2024 at 12:20:40
the matrimonial home are also contained in the said complaint. In the said complaint the Petitioner prays for action to be taken against his wife and her family members. The Petitioner also seeks registration of FIR for offences under Section 141, 149, 182, 191, 211, 384, 389 503, 504, 511, 34 R/w 120 of IPC.
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.
AMIT SHARMA, J.
NOVEMBER 06, 2024 kr/pr/ms
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/11/2024 at 12:20:40
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant expedited hearing for pending criminal case in interest of petitioner.
Sanjeev Kumar
State of NCT of Delhi
Prathiba M. Singh
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
