Dismissed

Yogender Kumar Sharma v. State Goverment of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC15 Feb 2024CRL.M.C./1224/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought quashing of cognizance, summons, an FIR and chargesheet. Petitioner sought leave to withdraw with liberty to raise contentions at charge framing; the High Court granted liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw granted with liberty to raise contentions at charge consideration; petition dismissed as withdrawn; pending applications disposed of.

Yogender Kumar Sharma Vs State Goverment of NCT of Delhi — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~57

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 1224/2024 & CRL.M.A. 4850/2024 (Stay)

¶4

YOGENDER KUMAR SHARMA ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Rahul Gupta & Mr. Rughwendra Pratap, Advocates.

¶6

versus STATE GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with SI Murari Krishan, P.S. NFC New Delhi & W/SI Nishu Sharma, P.S. Govindpuri. Ms. Hena Lamba & Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Advocate for complainant.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 15.02.2024 CRL.M.A. 4851/2024 (Exemption)

¶10

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶11

The application is accordingly disposed of.

¶12

CRL.M.C. 1224/2024 & CRL.M.A. 4850/2024 (Stay)

¶13

The present petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeks the

¶14

following prayers:

¶15

“(i) Pass an Order quashing the Order dated 03.04.2023 passed by the Ld. ACMM, South-East District, Saket Court, New Delhi by which cognizance has been taken and summons have been issued to the Petitioner;

¶16

(ii) Pass an Order quashing FIR No. 477 of 2022 dated 31.12.2022 and the Chargesheet dated 01.03.2023 filed in the said case and all proceedings emanating therefrom pending before the Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, SouthEast District, Saket Court, New Delhi; (iii) Any other order/directions that the court may deem fit and proper

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:41:58

¶18

in the present facts and circumstances.”

¶19

It is pointed out that the matter before the learned Trial Court is fixed for consideration on point of charge on 11.03.2024.

¶20

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the latter, seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise the contentions taken herein before the learned Trial Court at the time of consideration on charge.

¶21

Leave and liberty granted.

¶22

The learned Trial Court is requested to proceed with the arguments on the point of charge without giving any undue adjournment to either of the parties.

¶23

With the aforesaid direction, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶24

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶25

Order be communicated to the learned Trial Court for necessary information and compliance.

¶26

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶27

FEBRUARY 15, 2024/bsr

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:41:58

Yogender Kumar Sharma v. State Goverment of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogender Kumar Sharma v. State Goverment of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sai Ramakrishna Karuturi Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Pappu Singh Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Deepak Mann Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi )

Parveen Vs State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.

Saurabh Bhatia and Others Vs the State and Another

Sharafat Sheikh Vs State, NCT of Delhi