Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to keep contentions open. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
BIMLA@VIMLA@BRAHAMKALI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Syed Hasan Isfahani, Ms. Shifa, Advs.
versus
LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC, Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Adv. with SI Yashpal Singh, PS Farsh Bazar
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R D E R % 28.08.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with the liberty of keeping all his contentions open.
In view of the submissions made above, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
AUGUST 28, 2024
Pallavi /DG
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/08/2024 at 11:44:06
BIMLA@VIMLA@BRAHAMKALI
LT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ANR.
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
