Allowed

Amardeep Singh Mond v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC13 Nov 2024CRL.M.C./2573/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a petition for quashing FIR No. 392/2024 registered under sections 420/120B/384/34 IPC. Based on a settlement verified by the complainant, the FIR was quashed against the petitioner alone, while proceedings against the intervenor remain active due to lack of her specific consent. Pending applications were dismissed as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 392/2023 and eminating proceedings are quashed qua the petitioner; remaining proceedings against the intervenor continue.

Amardeep Singh Mond Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~50

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 2573/2024 CRL.M.A. 9820/2024 CRL.M.A. 10857/2024

¶4

CRL.M.A. 13035/2024 CRL.M.A. 26851/2024

¶5

AMARDEEP SINGH MOND

¶6

.....Petitioner

¶7

Through: Mr. Vidur Mohan, Mr. Vipul Agrawal, Mr. Kaushal Singh, Mr. Sooraj Sharma, Mr. Aniruddha Das, Mr. Jayant Saini, Advs.

¶8

versus

¶9

STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP for State. with SI Dharmendra Sharma, PS Rajinder Nagar. Mr. Tanveer Ahmed Mir and Mr. Vaibhav Suri, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Amit Sahni, Mr. Ankur & Mr. Parth Sharma, Advs. for intervenor Ms. Geetika Dahiya

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶11

O R D E R % 13.11.2024

¶12

This petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.392/2023 under Sections 420/120B/384/34 IPC at PS Rajinder Nagar, Delhi, basis settlement arrived at between the parties, on 21^st February 2024 with the facilitation of Mediation & Conciliation Centre, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh, which is on the record of this Court.

¶13

Counsels for petitioner and complainant, confirm that various aspects of the settlement have been complied with, consequent whereupon, FIR No.18/2023 registered at Anti-Corruption Bureau, Panchkula stood quashed

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:15:42

¶16

by order of Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh dated 30^th August 2024. An affidavit dated 6^th June 2024 has been furnished by Mr. Rajiv Gambhir, respondent no.2/complainant, stating that in the event FIR No.18/2023 is quashed, he will give full consent to quashing of FIR No.392/2023, qua the petitioner Amardeep Singh.

¶17

Petitioner and respondent no.2 are present through VC and are duly identified by the IO and their respective counsels.

¶18

There is an intervention filed by Ms. Geetika Dahiya, wife of petitioner, who is also a co-accused in the matter. However, the counsel for complainant, on instructions, states that there is no consent for quashing the FIR qua her (Ms. Geetika Dahiya) and proceedings may continue accordingly.

¶19

Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Consequently, the FIR No.392/2023 under Sections 420/120B/384/34 IPG at PS Rajinder Nagar, Delhi and proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed qua the petitioner Amardeep Singh.

¶20

Parties shall abide by the terms of settlement.

¶21

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Pending applications are disposed of as infructuous.

¶22

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶23

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶24

NOVEMBER 13, 2024/sm/ kp

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/11/2024 at 12:15:42

Amardeep Singh Mond v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amardeep Singh Mond v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sachin Vs State through SHO Ps Sonia Vihar

Saurabh @ Sanajy Vs the State Govt of Delhi

Subudhi Jain & Ors. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Akash Sharma Vs State of Delhi and Anr.

Rajan Parmar Vs Mamta Parmar

Sh. Bhupender Singh Vs Smt. Brijlata and Anr.