Dismissed

Hardeep Kumar v. Neha

Delhi HC3 Jul 2024CONT.CAS(C)/977/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court dismissed an application seeking recall of an order dismissing contempt proceedings. The court held the petition under the Contempt of Courts Act was not maintainable as the impugned Family Court order was executable, directing the petitioner to pursue remedies before the Family Court.

What did the court decide?

Application for recalling the order dated 03.07.2024 dismissed without prejudice.

Hardeep Kumar Vs Neha — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~83

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 977/2024

¶4

HARDEEP KUMAR .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Bharat Bagga, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

NEHA .....Respondent

¶8

Through: None. CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R % 18.07.2024

¶11

This hearing is being conducted through hybrid mode.

¶12

CM APPL. 39901/2024 (For recalling of order dated 03.07.2024)

¶13

This application has been moved on behalf of the petitioner for recalling of the order dated 03.07.2024, whereby the petition filed by the petitioner seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent/wife, has been dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶14

None appeared on behalf of the respondent/wife despite sending advance notice.

¶15

Although, the petitioner is able to show sufficient cause for his non-appearance on 03.07.2024, however, this petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is not maintainable since the impugned order dated 28.05.2024, which has been passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, is in an executable order.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the matter is listed for hearing before the learned Judge, Family Courts, North-West

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2024 at 11:16:50

¶19

District, Rohini Courts, Delhi, on 23.07.2024.

¶20

There is no gainsaying that the Family Court have ample powers to enforce its directions in accordance with law. The petitioner shall be at liberty to pursue an appropriate remedy before the learned Family Court.

¶21

The present application is dismissed without prejudice.

¶22

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

¶23

JULY 18, 2024 sp

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2024 at 11:16:50

Hardeep Kumar v. Neha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hardeep Kumar v. Neha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalpana Dudeja Vs Jaideep Kumar Mishra & Ors.

Saher Ali Vs Sh. Manish Kumar Gupta and Ors.

Gulshan Babbar, Advocate Vs Surya Prakash Khatri & Ors.

Rachana Srivastava Vs Sh Prasenjit Singh

Mohit Vats Vs Smt. Sheetal Vats

Arun Kumar Sharma Vs Sharif Ahmed Alias Babbu

Balvinder Singh Vs Prem Sapra & Anr.

Sh. Kedar Nath Jhanb Vs Sh. Manoj Kumar

Atmastco Ltd. Vs Mandeep Kalra

Gulshan Babbar, Advocate Vs Surya Prakash Khatri & Ors.

Rachana Srivastava Vs Sh Prasenjit Singh

Dharampreet Singh Vs Mr Ravinder Kumar & Anr.

Dev Surana Vs Neha Golcha

Mohit Vats Vs Smt. Sheetal Vats