Disposed

Gulshan Babbar, Advocate v. Surya Prakash Khatri & Ors.

Delhi HC2 Jul 2024CONT.CAS(C)/1002/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought initiation of contempt proceedings for alleged disobedience of a court order. Respondents clarified typographical errors in the complaint. Petitioner withdrew the petition, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as not pressed due to clarification of typographical errors in the complaint and voluntary withdrawal by the petitioner.

Gulshan Babbar, Advocate Vs Surya Prakash Khatri & Ors. — Delhi HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~21

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1002/2024

¶4

GULSHAN BABBAR, ADVOCATE ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through Mr. Qayam-Ud-In, Mr. M. S. Husain, Mr. Abdul Wasin and Mr. Aastha Singh, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

SURYA PRAKASH KHATR	I & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through	Mr. Rajesh Mishra, Mr. Harish
	Singhal, Mr. Abhishek Goutam,
	Mr. Bed Prakash and Mr. A.
	Kapur, Advocates for R-1.
	Mr. T. Singhdev, Mr. Aabhaas
	Sukhramant, Ms. Anum
	Hussain and Mr. Tanishq
	Srivastava, Advocates for R-2.
	Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr.
	Advocate with Mr. Arshdeep
	Singh Khurana, Mr. Vaibhav
	Tomar, Mr. Peeyush Bhatia,
	Ms. Tannavi Sharma, Mr. Sidak
	Singh Anand and Mr. Ravi
	Chaudhary, Advocates for R-3 & R-4.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA O R D E R

¶10

% 02.07.2024

¶11

This hearing is being conducted through hybrid mode.

¶12

CM APPL. 36262/2024 (Ex.)

¶13

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 14:20:31

¶16

The application stands disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 1002/2024

¶17

The petitioner is seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for disobedience of the order dated 05.06.2024.

¶18

Learned counsels for the respondents are present on advance notice.

¶19

Having heard the learned counsels for the parties, it appears that all relevant documents have been supplied to the petitioner. However, as submitted by the learned Senior Counsel for respondents No. 3 & 4, in so far as the complaint lodged on behalf of the complainant company is concerned, there is a typographical error in paragraph (3) (iv) to the effect that the date of the order of Court has been incorrectly typed/written as 19.01.2024, which should be read as 19.01.2022. It is also pointed out that likewise, there is another typographical error in the complaint in paragraph (4) wherein the date of the order is indicated as 06.04.2024, which should be written as 04.03.2024. He also points out that notwithstanding such typographical mistakes; the copies of the orders are already attached with the complaint which has been supplied to the petitioner.

¶20

In view of the clarifications given by the learned Senior Counsel for respondents No. 3 & 4, learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of, as not pressed.

¶21

DHARMESH SHARMA, J

¶22

JULY 02, 2024/ ssc

¶23

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/07/2024 at 14:20:31

Gulshan Babbar, Advocate v. Surya Prakash Khatri & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gulshan Babbar, Advocate v. Surya Prakash Khatri & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sapna@Neeta Malhotra Vs Rajiv Malhotra & Ors.

Subhash Aggarwal Vs Bses Rajdhani Power Limited & Ors.

Anupam Ojha Mishra Vs Gaurav Mishra

Badshah Ali Vs Shri Gyanesh Bharti & Ors.

Dharampreet Singh Vs Mr Ravinder Kumar & Anr.

Dev Surana Vs Neha Golcha

Hardeep Kumar Vs Neha

Mohit Vats Vs Smt. Sheetal Vats

Sapna@Neeta Malhotra Vs Rajiv Malhotra & Ors.

Shri Kuldeep Deswal Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Mandeep Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Atmastco Ltd. Vs Mandeep Kalra

Rachana Srivastava Vs Sh Prasenjit Singh