Dismissed
Kusum @ Kusham & Ors. v. v.K.Sharma & Ors.
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/877/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The petition was dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner and their counsel.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~136
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CONT.CAS(C) 877/2023 & CM APPL. 33604/2023, CM APPL. 33605/2023
¶4
- KUSUM @ KUSHAM & ORS. .....Petitioners
¶5
- Through: None.
¶6
versus
¶7
V.K.SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ram Kumar and Mr. Sushil Kumar, Advocate for R-3/DUSIB. Counsel for Railways.
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
¶9
- Learned counsel for DUSIB is present in the Court.
¶10
- Learned counsel for the respondent, Railways is present through
¶11
VC.
¶12
- No one has appeared for the petitioner, when the matter was called.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Kusum @ Kusham & Ors.
- respondent
V.K.Sharma & Ors.
Coram
AI extract
Dharmesh Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court