Contempt petition against MCD officials dismissed as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw and respondent no.6 reported approaching the MCD Appellate Tribunal against the impugned orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~185
NISHA KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sohail Khan and Mr. Naveen Solanki, Advocates.
versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER, SHRI GYANESH BHARTI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajjay Arora, Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advocates and Mr. Vansh Luthra, Advocates for MCD.
Mr. M. Hasibuddin and Mr. Bheem Singh, Advocates for R5 & R6.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
O R D E R % 12.08.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/08/2024 at 11:39:07
Learned counsel for the MCD has no objection either.
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
AUGUST 12, 2024/ pkv
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/08/2024 at 11:39:07
Nisha Khan
The Deputy Commissioner, through its Commissioner, Shri Gyanesh Bharti & Ors.
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
