Disposed

Triveni Apartments Welfare Association v. Ashwani Kumar Commissioner South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Delhi HC12 Dec 2024CONT.CAS(C)/1969/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Appellant filed a contempt petition for wilful disobedience regarding failure to update mobile numbers of traffic officers. Respondent undertook to share new numbers. Petitioner withdrew grievance on that assurance; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of; applicant left with no further grievance pending provision of updated numbers.

Triveni Apartments Welfare Association Vs Ashwani Kumar… — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~106

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of Decision: 12^th December, 2024

¶4

- CONT.CAS(C) 1969/2024

¶5

TRIVENI APARTMENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION

¶6

.....Petitioner Through: Mrs. Akriti Seth with Mr. Manu Seth, Advocates.

¶7

versus

¶8

ASHWANI KUMAR COMMISSIONER SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.

¶9

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, SC with Mr. Harsh Yadav, Advocates. Mr. Neeraj Dubey, Advocate for R-2 and 3. ASI Devender Singh Parvi Officer

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)

¶12

Petitioner seeks initiation of contempt proceedings for wilful disobedience of directions contained in order dated 09.05.2019 passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No. 6106/2018.

¶13

By virtue of the above said order, the Delhi Police had furnished mobile Nos. of Traffic-in-charge of the area in question so that whenever petitioner association finds any instance of unauthorized parking of commercial vehicles for long duration, such officers can be contacted to for taking immediate action in accordance with law.

¶14

It is submitted that these numbers are no longer of the concerned person and, therefore, there is wilful disobedience of the above said order.

¶15

¶16

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 3.12.2024 18:43:56

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if the concerned officer had been transferred out, it was incumbent on the part of the respondent Police to have, at least, shared the number of the new incumbent.

¶18

Mr. Neeraj Dubey, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 and 3 appears on advance notice and submits that within two days, the new numbers of the concerned officer shall be shared with the petitioner through e-mail.

¶19

Such statement is taken on record.

¶20

In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, at the moment, she is left with no further grievance.

¶21

Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶22

(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE

¶23

DECEMBER 12, 2024/ sw

¶24

¶25

Signature Not Verified

¶26

Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 3.12.2024 18:43:56

Triveni Apartments Welfare Association v. Ashwani Kumar Commissioner South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Triveni Apartments Welfare Association v. Ashwani Kumar Commissioner South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neeraj Kumar Vs Shri Ajay Kumar Bhalla and Ors.

Neeti Vs Sh Arihant Khicha

Sarpal Singh Vs Amardeep Singh Bhatia & Ors.

Poonam Sehrawat Vs Anoop Sehrawat & Anr.

Ab Vs Cd

Raghubir Singh & Ors. Vs Sh. Gyanesh Bharti & Ors.

Sharda Devi Vs Shri Dharmendra & Ors.

Ni-Met Metals Inc. Vs Director General of Foreign Trade and Anr. & Anr.

Neeraj Kumar Vs Shri Ajay Kumar Bhalla and Ors.

Neeti Vs Sh Arihant Khicha

Ms. Harshil Maheshwari Vs Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority & Ors.

Dr Rakesh Kumar Bhartiya Vs Amrit Mohan Prasad IPS

Manavjit Singh Sandhu & Ors. Vs M/S Pratap University & Ors.

Dr. S.L. Grover & Anr. Vs M/S Pratap University & Ors.