Writ petition disposed of on the request of the petitioner's counsel, noting that most grievances had been addressed during pendency. Liberty was granted.
Liberty granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~125
MS. HARSHIL MAHESHWARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amish Tandon, Ms. Vaishnavi and Ms. Harshil Maheshwari, Advocates
versus
INVESTOR EDUCATION AND PROTECTION FUND AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. K.D. Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Aditya Goyal and Mr. Srikant Mishra, Advocates for R1 & R3 Mr. Anirudh Bakharu, Mr. Ayush Puri and Ms. Vijaylakshmi, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 11.12.2024
MANOJ JAIN, J
DECEMBER 11, 2024/dr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 08:28:07
MS. HARSHIL MAHESHWARI
INVESTOR EDUCATION AND PROTECTION FUND AUTHORITY & ORS.
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
