Petitioner's application allowed subject to exceptions. Petitioner not pressing petition as respondent to decide representation within two weeks. Petitioner granted liberty to revive if representation not decided within period.
Petitioner granted liberty to revive proceedings if representation not decided within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~108
SH. SAJAN KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Gagan Kumar Singhal and Mr. Divyanshu Pandit, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 20.11.2024
CM APPL. 66531/2024 (Ex.)
CONT.CAS(C) 1796/2024
CONT.CAS(C) 1796/2024 1
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 05:16:53
respondent, the present petition is disposed of as not pressed.
MANOJ JAIN, J
NOVEMBER 20, 2024/ns
CONT.CAS(C) 1796/2024 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 05:16:53
Sh. Sajan Kumar
Sh. P.K. Jha
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
