The court dismissed the contempt petition as withdrawn after parties reached an amicable settlement and filed an MOU.
Contempt petition dismissed as withdrawn; next hearing cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~79 & 80
versus
ANG SWEE MENG DIRECTOR PICO HONG KONG LTD & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ginny J. Rautray, Mr. Navdeep Singh, Ms. Devika Thakur & Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Advs. for R3 & R4.
80
versus ANG SWEE MENG & ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Ginny J. Rautray, Mr. Navdeep Singh, Ms. Devika Thakur & Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Advs. for R3 & R4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA O R D E R % 08.08.2024
CM APPL. 45383/2024 in CONT.CAS(C) 265/2012 CM APPL. 45382/2024 in CONT.CAS(C) 178/2020
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 11:37:19
reached an amicable settlement and the Memorandum of Understanding [„MOU‟] dated 19.07.2024 is also placed on the record.
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
AUGUST 8, 2024/sa
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 11:37:19
DEEPALI DESIGNS & EXHIBITS PVT LTD
ANG SWEE MENG DIRECTOR PICO HONG KONG LTD
ANG SWEE MENG
DHARMESH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
