Petitioner sought closure of a bank account pending upon a lien. The respondent informed the court that the lien was lifted and account closure approved. Petitioner prayed to withdraw the writ petition; allowed.
Withdrawal of the petition allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
MEGHA SETHI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Ms. Vaishali Shukla and Mr. Aashish Arya, Advs.
versus
UNION BANK OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mrinal Jha and Mr. A.K. Shukla, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA O R D E R % 07.08.2024
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
AUGUST 7, 2024 sp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 11:45:28
Megha Sethi
Union Bank of India
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
