Petitioner sought withdrawal of the contempt case; counsel stated instructions were received not to press the petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without further discussion.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~36
ASHISH KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Neha Jain, Advocate. (M): 7347688121 Email: [email protected]
versus
AASTHA GANDHI KUMAR ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sunil Mittal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Seema Seth and Mr. Sanjiv Saluja, Advocates. (M): 9810602729
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 16.02.2024
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
FEBRUARY 16, 2024 c
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 15:10:03
Ashish Kumar
Aastha Gandhi Kumar
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
