In a contempt petition, the petitioner's counsel stated the matter was settled between the parties and the settlement amount, paid by the nephew of the accused, had been received. Leave to withdraw the petition was granted and it was dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with leave granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Arpit Sirvastava, Advocate
versus
BALJEET KAUR ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Deepak Shukla, Advocate with respondent in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
O R D E R % 19.02.2024
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2024 na
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2024 at 14:37:04
M/S Moneyplus Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.
Baljeet Kaur
Manoj Kumar Ohri
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
