On the dismissal of a contempt petition filed for wilful disobedience of a previous order, the Court held that the petition does not survive as the respondents furnished a statement indicating compliance with the Court's directions.
The contempt petition is dismissed as it no longer survives in view of the compliance shown.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~81
Through: Mr.Javed Ahmad, Ms.Jaismin Abbas and Ms.Aakriti Aditya, Advocates.
versus
ASHWINI KUMAR AND ORS
.....Respondent Through: Ms.Beenashaw N.Soni, SC with Ms.Ann Joseph, Advocate for R-1 and 2. Mr.Ratan Prakash, GP for R-3 SI Narayan Ojha, PS Hauz Qazi.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
O R D E R
% 28.08.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/08/2024 at 12:50:51
DHARMESH SHARMA, J.
AUGUST 28, 2024/ VLD
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/08/2024 at 12:50:51
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition survives given the statement that the impugned order is being complied with.
Iqbal Ahmed
Ashwini Kumar
Dharmesh Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
