Disposed

Sh. Shubh Chandan v. Smt. Sushma

Delhi HC29 Aug 2024CONT.CAS(C)/1349/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Husband sought contempt against wife for breaching a settlement MoU regarding visitation rights; respondent did not appear. Counsel for petitioner sought withdrawal with liberty to raise legal objections in pending DV Act proceedings, and the petition was permitted to be withdrawn without prejudice.

What did the court decide?

Petition permitted to be withdrawn without prejudice with liberty to raise objections in pending MM (Mahila Court) proceedings.

Sh. Shubh Chandan Vs Smt. Sushma — Domestic Violence | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~93

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1349/2024

¶4

SH. SHUBH CHANDAN .....Petitioner Through: Counsel (appearance not given)

¶5

versus

¶6

SMT. SUSHMA .....Respondent

¶7

Through: None.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R % 29.08.2024

¶11

CM APPL. 49373/2024 (Ex.)

¶12

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

The application shall stand disposed of. CONT.CAS(C) 1349/2024

¶14

The petitioner/husband is seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent/wife as she has reneged on her undertaking contained in Memorandum of Undertaking dated 25.01.2024, which undertaking had been accepted by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.

¶15

None appeared on behalf of the respondent despite sending advance notice.

¶16

It appears that the respondent after entering into a settlement vide the MoU dated 25.01.2024, although had given up her visitation rights with the child is re-asserting such rights,. It also appears that she has filed an application under Section 12 of the Protection of

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/08/2024 at 11:30:23

¶19

Women from Domestic Violence Act which is pending before the learned MM (Mahila Court).

¶20

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner requests that she may be allowed to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take all relevant legal objections before the pending proceedings before the learned MM (Mahila Court) in accordance with law.

¶21

The withdrawal of the present petition is allowed without prejudice.

¶22

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

¶23

AUGUST 29, 2024 sp

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/08/2024 at 11:30:23

Sh. Shubh Chandan v. Smt. Sushma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sh. Shubh Chandan v. Smt. Sushma

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sona Chawla Vs Ashwini Sehgal & Anr.

Amit Sharma Vs Sh.Naresh Kumar, and Ors.

Ms Economy Sales Vs New Delhi Municipal Corporation & Anr.

Surya Praksh Taygi Vs Anil Baijal Lt Govener & Ors.

Naresh Kumar Vs Union of India through E-in-C Lt. Gen Arvind Walia Avsm

North Delhi Municipal Corporation Vs Akram Khan, Director, Honshu Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.

Court on Its Own Motion Vs Mukesh Mittal

Sunrise India Vs the Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax and Anr.

Sona Chawla Vs Ashwini Sehgal & Anr.

Amit Sharma Vs Sh.Naresh Kumar, and Ors.

Inderjeet Singh Tosaria Vs Delhi Development Authority

Mithlesh Vs Bablu

Shailesh Kumar Jaiswal Alias Sailesh Kumar Jaiswal Vs Punjab and Sind Bank & Ors.

Sethi Sons (India) Vs Assistant Commissioner, Central GST & Ors.