Disposed

Sunil Kumar Chandra v. M/S Spire Techpark Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC1 Oct 2024O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)/91/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act for appointment of a substitute arbitrator after the earlier arbitrator's withdrawal. Allegations against respondent's counsel were expunged on the petitioner's statement. The Court appointed Ms. Varuna Bhandari Gugnani as Sole Arbitrator under DIAC aegis and disposed of the petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sunil Kumar Chandra Vs M/S Spire Techpark Pvt. Ltd. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~11

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 91/2024

¶4

SUNIL KUMAR CHANDRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.D. Singh, Mrs. Shweta Sinha, Mr. Kamla Prasad, Mr. Siddhartha Singh and Ms. Meenu Singh, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

M/S SPIRE TECHPARK PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Nistha Gupta and Mr. Anuj Panwar, Advocates.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD O R D E R % 01.10.2024

¶9

The Petitioner has approached this Court under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act for appointment of a substitute Arbitrator in view of the withdrawal of the learned Arbitrator from the arbitration proceedings vide Order dated 07.08.2024.

¶10

The facts of the case reveal that an Arbitrator had been appointed by this Court vide Communication dated 18.01.2023 in ARB.P. 1102/2022. However, vide Order dated 07.08.2024, the learned Arbitrator has expressed her inability to continue with the Arbitration.

¶11

Learned Counsel for the Respondent states that she has no objection to appoint the substitute Arbitrator. However, she states that there have been allegations made in the petition regarding the conduct of the Counsel for the Respondent.

¶12

Mr. S D Singh, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, states that he does not press any of the averments made against the Counsels and states that all

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2024 at 10:51:41

¶15

the submissions made against the Counsels be treated as expunged from the petition. The statement is taken on record. All the allegations made against the Counsels stand expunged.

¶16

During the course of hearing, respective Counsel for the parties jointly request that an independent Sole Arbitrator be appointed to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶17

Accordingly, Ms. Varuna Bhandari Gugnani (Adv.) (Mob. No. 9810400605) is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties.

¶18

The arbitration would take place under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) and would abide by its rules and regulations. The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.

¶19

The learned Arbitrator is also requested to file the requisite disclosure under Section 12(2) of the 1996 Act within a week of entering on reference. 9. All rights and contentions of the parties in relation to the claims/counter-claims are kept open, to be decided by the learned Arbitrator on their merits, in accordance with law.

¶20

Needless to say, nothing in this order shall be construed as an expression of this Court on the merits of the contentions of the parties. 11. The petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any.

¶21

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶22

OCTOBER 1, 2024 hsk

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2024 at 10:51:41

Sunil Kumar Chandra v. M/S Spire Techpark Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sunil Kumar Chandra v. M/S Spire Techpark Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Chandradeep Singhal Vs Smt. Rashmi Singhal & Ors.

M/S Proto-D-Engineering and Ors. Vs Clix Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as Ms Clix Finance India Pvt. Ltd)

Arjun Singh Bawa Vs State & Ors.

Bunge Sa Geneva a Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Switzerland Vs Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited & Anr.

Pooja Sahni & Anr. Vs Amw Lifestyle Private Limited & Ors.

Ahluwalia Contracts India Limited Vs Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board