Partly allowed

Bunge Sa Geneva a Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Switzerland v. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited & Anr.

Delhi HC1 Oct 2024O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/219/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi corrected typographical errors in an interim order regarding freight and cargo. Subsequently, the court disposed of the main commercial petition as withdrawn after the petitioner paid the disputed amount.

What did the court decide?

I.A. 41069/2024 allowed; Main Petition 219/2024 disposed of as withdrawn.

Bunge Sa Geneva a Company Incorporated Under the Laws of… — Company and Corporate | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~69

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 219/2024

¶4

BUNGE SA GENEVA A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF SWITZERLAND .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arvind Kumar Gupta, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents

¶7

Through: Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Mr. Udit Kr. Thakur & Mr. Vaibhav Dayma, Advocates for Respondent No.1

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶10

O R D E R % 01.10.2024 I.A. 41069/2024

¶11

This is an application on behalf of the Petitioner for correction of the Order dated 25.09.2024.

¶12

It is stated that there are some typographical errors in the said order. It is stated that in Paragraph No.1 of the said order, it has been recorded that “This application has been filed by the Respondent No.1 seeking vacation of status quo Order dated 09.07.2024, passed by this Court with respect to the cargo of 29,000 MT of cocking coal which is the subject matter of the dispute in the present petition” instead of “This application has been filed by the Respondent No.1 seeking vacation of status quo Order dated 09.07.2024, passed by this Court with respect to the attachment of the cargo of 29,000 MT of coking coal towards the 100% outstanding freight and demurrage which is the subject matter of the dispute in the present petition.”

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2024 at 10:51:32

¶15

It is stated that in Paragraph Nos. 2, 4, 5 & 6 of the Order dated 25.09.2024, it has been recorded that “10% of the freight invoice amounting to USD 108,872.28 ” instead of “10% of the freight and demurrage invoice amounting to USD 1,088,827.69 ”.

¶16

Similarly, it is stated that in Paragraph No.6 this Court had directed “ the Petitioner” instead of “ Respondent No.2” to release the balance 20000 MT of the coking coal. It is also stated that in Paragraph 4 & 6 of the said Order, the word “Defendant” has been mentioned, instead of “Respondent”.

¶17

The said order stands corrected accordingly.

¶18

Let a copy of this order be supplied conjointly as and when a certified copy of the Order dated 25.09.2024 is applied for.

¶19

The application is disposed of.

¶20

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 219/2024

¶21

Even though only I.A. 41069/2024 has been listed for hearing today, learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that since the entire amount has been paid, he will withdraw the present petition.

¶22

Needless to state that the Petitioner is always at liberty to claim any other amount that is due and payable to him by the Respondent(s).

¶23

In view of the above, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶24

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶25

OCTOBER 1, 2024 hsk

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/10/2024 at 10:51:32

Bunge Sa Geneva a Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Switzerland v. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bunge Sa Geneva a Company Incorporated Under the Laws of Switzerland v. Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Chandradeep Singhal Vs Smt. Rashmi Singhal & Ors.

M/S Proto-D-Engineering and Ors. Vs Clix Capital Services Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Known as Ms Clix Finance India Pvt. Ltd)

Arjun Singh Bawa Vs State & Ors.

Pooja Sahni & Anr. Vs Amw Lifestyle Private Limited & Ors.

Sunil Kumar Chandra Vs M/S Spire Techpark Pvt. Ltd.

Ahluwalia Contracts India Limited Vs Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board