Allowed

Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. v. M/S Ram Krishan Associates Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC2 Sept 2024O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)/87/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi appointed retired Justice R.K. Gauba as a substitute arbitrator to replace the recused Justice V. Ramasubramanian under Section 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

What did the court decide?

Appointment of Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.K. Gauba as substitute arbitrator with same terms and conditions as the recused arbitrator.

Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. Vs M/S Ram Krishan Associates Pvt. Ltd. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~57

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 87/2024, I.A. 38099/2024

¶4

ASIAN HOTELS (NORTH) LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ritin Rai, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Humraaz Bir Singh, Mr. A. Kaul and Mr. Aman Sahani, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

M/S RAM KRISHAN ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Dhingra, Ms. Snesh Somani and Mr. Aastik Dhingra, Advs.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR

¶8

O R D E R (ORAL) % 02.09.2024

¶9

I.A. 38099/2024 (for exemption)

¶10

1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

2. Application stands disposed of.

¶12

O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 87/2024

¶13

3. This is a petition under Section 14(1)(b) read with Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996¹ for appointing a substitute arbitrator, as Justice (Retd.) V. Ramasubramanian, who was

¶14

1 “the 1996 Act”, hereinafter Signature Not Verified

¶15

Signature Not Verified

¶16

Digitally Signed By:CHANDRASHEKHARAN HARI SHANKAR Signing Date: 03.0 9.2024 18:19:30

¶17

Digitally Signed By: AJIT KUMAR OMP (T) (COMM.) 87/2024 Signing Da te:0 3.09.2024 18:21:35

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

arbitrating on the disputes between the parties, has recused from the proceedings.

¶20

4. Accordingly, this Court appoints Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.K. Gauba (Tel. 9650411919), a learned retired Judge of this Court as the arbitrator. The terms and conditions of the learned arbitrator shall be the same as those which applied to Justice (Retd.) V. Ramasubramanian. The arbitration shall continue from the stage at which they were when Justice Ramasubramanian recused from the proceedings.

¶21

5. Learned Counsel for the parties state that there are 21 connected matters which were also being adjudicated by Justice Ramasubramanian. It shall be open to the parties to request to the learned arbitrator, who is being appointed today, to arbitrate on the said 21 matters.

¶22

6. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶23

C.HARI SHANKAR, J

¶24

SEPTEMBER 02, 2024 /aky

¶25

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶26

Signature Not Verified

¶27

Signature Not Verified

¶28

Digitally Signed Page 2 of 2 By:CHANDRASHEKHARANHARI SHANKAR Signing Date: 03.0 9.2024 18:19:30

¶29

Digitally Signed By: AJIT KUMAR OMP (T) (COMM.) 87/2024 Signing Da te:0 3.09.2024 18:21:35

Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. v. M/S Ram Krishan Associates Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Asian Hotels (North) Ltd. v. M/S Ram Krishan Associates Pvt. Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tcns Clothing Company Limited Vs a and a Enterprises & Ors.

Chroma Power Systems India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Indraprastha Gas Limited

Paisalo Digital Limited Vs Puran Murti Educational Society & Ors.

American Epay Services Private Limited Vs Orbit in-Te-Rio

Atma Ram Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Post Office and Ors.

Mis. Tata Aldesa (Jv) Vs Mis. Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited (Dfccil)