The Court allowed a Section 17 application. Counsel agreed the application should be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal to be constituted by the Court that day in connected proceedings.
Section 17 application allowed to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted by the Court on that day.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
AMERICAN EPAY SERVICES PRIVATE
LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vipin Tyagi, Ms. Preeti Singh and Mr. Tanishq Juneja, Advs.
versus
ORBIT IN-TE-RIO .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Ashim Shridhar and Ms. Radhika Gupta, Advs.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R (ORAL) 02.09.2024
1. Learned counsel for both the sides agree to the present petition being treated as a Section 17 application, to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal as constituted by this Court today in Arb. P. 1013/2024.
2. The petition stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.
3. Interim orders to continue subject to further orders to be passed by the learned arbitrator.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
SEPTEMBER 02, 2024 /aky
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Signature Not Verified
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed By:CHANDRASHEKHAR Page 1 of 1 AN HARI SHANKAR Signing Da te:03 .09.2024 22:28
Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 71/2024 Signing Date:03.0 9.20 24 22:29
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Section 17 application for appointing an arbitrator should be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted by the Court today.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
American Epay Services Private Limited
Orbit In-Te-Rio
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
