Interim relief petition under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was disposed of after the parties informed the court that an Arbitral Tribunal had been constituted; the petition was directed to be treated as a Section 17 application before the sole arbitrator, with subsisting interim orders to continue until its disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~88
SYRMA SGS TECHNOLOGY LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashank Garg, Sr. Adv. alongwith Mr. Aakash Bajaj and Ms. Prerana B., Advocates.
versus
APTOS TECHNOLOGY INC .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. alongwith Mr. Ship Sapra, Mr. Aviral Tripathi and Ms. Madhupreeta Nayak, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 16.12.2024
SACHIN DATTA, J
DECEMBER 16, 2024/ at
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 04:15:03
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the pending Section 9 interim relief petition should be treated as an application under Section 17 of the A&C Act before the constituted Arbitral Tribunal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SYRMA SGS TECHNOLOGY LIMITED
APTOS TECHNOLOGY INC
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
