Disposed

Ranjit Construction Company v. Gujrat State Road and Building Deprtment & Ors.

Delhi HC30 Jan 2024O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/341/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 9 arbitration petition withdrawn after appointment of a sole arbitrator, with liberty to move the arbitrator under section 17; interim relief granted earlier continued until the arbitrator takes a view.

What did the court decide?

Petition withdrawn; liberty to apply under s.17 before arbitrator; interim relief of order dated 09.12.2022 to continue until arbitrator decides.

Ranjit Construction Company Vs Gujrat State Road and Building… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~30

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 341/2022 & I.A. 19737/2022

¶4

RANJIT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Subhash Chawla, Advocate.

¶6

versus

¶7

GUJRAT STATE ROAD AND BUILDING DEPRTMENT & ORS.

¶8

..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ripin Sood, Advocate.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

¶10

O R D E R % 30.01.2024

¶11

The court is informed that vide judgment dated 10.07.2023 made in ARB. P. No. 1252/2022 titled M/s Ranjit Construction Company vs. Gujarat State Road & Building Department & Ors. , a learned Sole Arbitrator has been appointed in relation to the disputes between the parties that are subject-matter of the present petition.

¶12

Arbitration proceedings are stated to be still pending.

¶13

In view thereof, Mr. Subhash Chawla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition under section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (‘A&C Act’), with liberty to file an appropriate application under section 17 of the A&C Act before the learned Arbitrator, as may be permissible, in accordance with law, seeking the interim measures of protection as prayed for by way of this petition.

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 341/2022

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/08/2024 at 12:44:47

¶17

Furthermore, as prayed for on behalf of the petitioner, the interim relief granted vide order dated 09.12.2022 shall continue until such time as the learned Sole Arbitrator takes a view on the interim relief in the matter.

¶18

Upon being queried, Mr. Chawla submits that they have complied with the condition of deposit to which order dated 09.12.2022 was subject, by placing a Fixed Deposit Receipt in the requisite sum with respondent No.2 as evidenced by the documents appended to I.A. No.1568/2023.

¶19

The petition is disposed-of as withdrawn in the above terms, with liberty as prayed for; without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter.

¶20

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.

¶21

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J

¶22

JANUARY 30, 2024/ ak

¶23

Page 2 of 2

¶24

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 341/2022

¶25

Ranjit Construction Company v. Gujrat State Road and Building Deprtment & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjit Construction Company v. Gujrat State Road and Building Deprtment & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Schindler India Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S. Ncc Ltd.

Divyashakti Associates Private Limited Vs Keshav Lal Dua & Anr.

M/S Fortune Talkies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Naseem Ahmed

Cholamandalam Investment Finance Company Limited Vs M/S S.S Tours India & Ors.

Innovision Limited Vs Hpcl-Mittal Energy Limited

Mr. Rajesh Sharma Vs Mr. Rahul Sharma & Ors.