Arbitration petition seeking referral of disputes was withdrawn by the petitioner because the respondent's petition had already resulted in reference of the disputes to arbitration. Court disposed of the withdrawal without expressing any opinion on merits; pending applications also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Puneet Raj, Advocate.
versus
M/S S.S TOURS INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
%
O R D E R 30.01.2024
Mr. Puneet Raj, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present arbitration petition, submitting that on a petition filed by the respondent, the disputes between the parties have already been referred to arbitration.
The petition is accordingly disposed-of as withdrawn, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
JANUARY 30, 2024 V. Rawat
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:45:16
Cholamandalam Investment Finance Company Limited
M/s S.S Tours India & Ors.
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
