Disposed

M/S Rudranee Infra-Manisha Construction (Jv) v. National Highways Authority of India & Anr.

Delhi HC23 Sept 2024O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/325/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Disputes under an EPC agreement were, with consent of both parties, referred to arbitration before a three-member SAROD tribunal. The Court appointed Justice A.K. Patnaik as presiding arbitrator and permitted the petitioner to seek interim relief under Section 17 from the tribunal.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of by referring disputes to a three-member SAROD arbitral tribunal with Justice A.K. Patnaik as presiding arbitrator.

M/S Rudranee Infra-Manisha Construction (Jv) Vs National Highways… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~48

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 325/2024 & I.A. 40018/2024

¶4

M/S RUDRANEE INFRA-MANISHA CONSTRUCTION (JV) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Gunjan Chhabra, Mr. Dakesh Matta, Mr. Sarthak Arora & Ms. Shriya Mishra, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish K. Bishnoi & Mr. Khubaib Shakeerl, Advocates for R-1/NHAI. Mr. Santosh Kumar Rout, Standing Counsel for PNB with Ms. Dharma Veragi, Advocate for R-2/PNB [M:-9990432878]

¶7

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶8

O R D E R % 23.09.2024

¶9

In the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties agree, upon instructions, that the disputes between the parties under the contract dated 31.03.2023 entitled “ Engineering, Procurement and Construction Agreement ” [“the Agreement”] may be referred to arbitration in these proceedings itself.

¶10

The dispute resolution clause [Article 26] provides for a multi-

¶11

Page 1 of 3

¶12

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 325/2024

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:53:16

¶15

tiered dispute resolution process, successively before a Dispute Resolution Board [“DRB”], Conciliation Committee of Independent Experts and arbitration. Although some of the disputes have been referred to DRB, learned counsel have taken instructions and agree that the matter may be referred right away to arbitration under the aegis of Society for Affordable Redressal of Disputes [“SAROD”], as provided in article 26.3.1 of the Agreement.

¶16

The Rules of SAROD provide for a three-member arbitral tribunal, to be chosen from the list of arbitrators empanelled by it. Mr. Sandeep Sethi, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner wishes to nominate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Nandrajog, former Chief Justice of Rajasthan and Bombay High Courts as its nominee Arbitrator. Mr. Manish K. Bishnoi, learned counsel for the respondent - National Highways Authority of India, states that the respondent wishes to nominate Hon’ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian, former Judge, Supreme Court of India as its nominee Arbitrator. Both learned counsel request the Court to nominate a presiding arbitrator from the panel, so that the tribunal can be constituted forthwith. Acceding to this request, Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.K. Patnaik, former Judge, Supreme Court of India [Tel: +91-11-2693011] is appointed as the presiding Arbitrator.

¶17

The petitioner will be at liberty to make an application under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 before the learned arbitral tribunal and to request the learned arbitral tribunal to consider the same as expeditiously as possible, at least on the question of ad interim relief.

¶18

It is noted that the respondent has not yet invoked the bank

¶19

Page 2 of 3

¶20

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 325/2024

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:53:16

¶23

guarantees furnished by the petitioner in connection with the subject Agreement. Any action taken by the respondent will abide by and be subject to the directions of the arbitral tribunal.

¶24

It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the rights and contentions of the parties, even on a prima facie basis. All rights and contentions are left open for adjudication by the learned arbitral tribunal. 7. The petition, alongwith pending applications, stands disposed of.

¶25

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶26

SEPTEMBER 23, 2024

¶27

‘pv’/

¶28

Page 3 of 3

¶29

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 325/2024

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 12:53:16

M/S Rudranee Infra-Manisha Construction (Jv) v. National Highways Authority of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Rudranee Infra-Manisha Construction (Jv) v. National Highways Authority of India & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.P. Secure Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs Umang Dairies Ltd.

Vinod Krishna Vs M/S Arush Infra Promoters Private Limited

Luminous Power Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Eastman Auto and Power Limited

Dr. Ashoutosh Dev Kaushik Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sh. Akhtar Ali Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Shalini Katyal Shalini Sharma Vs Nitin Katyal