Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an order allowing amendment of plaint and impleadment of the actual proprietor based on false averments in original plaint made clear by respondent's written statement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~89
SHREE BALAJI LAMINATIONS
.....Petitioner
versus
SR GOYAL POLYMERS
.....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)
CM(M) 3438/2024 1
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:2 1.09.2024 14:25:38
(MANOJ JAIN)
JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 20, 2024/ss
CM(M) 3438/2024 2
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:2 1.09.2024 14:25:38
2 issues framed by the court
Whether amendment of plaint and impleadment of actual proprietor is permissible despite change in name of proprietor.
Whether impugned order exhibits illegality or perversity requiring interference under Article 227.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
SR Goyal Polymers
Ms. Anjali Aggarwal
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
