In an early hearing application regarding a delayed civil suit for declaration and possession, the Court allowed the petition and deemed the written statement admissible on record, imposing a penalty cost on the petitioner despite his absence.
Petition allowed; written statement deemed on record; petitioner directed to pay Rs.10,000 penalty cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~90
SMT. NEETU SAINI .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Nitin Jain, Advocate (through V.C.)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)
CM(M) 801/2023 & CM APPL. 55614/2024 (early hearing)
Signature Not Verified
Page 1 of 3
CM(M) 801/2023
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:2 4.09.2024 17:15:32
dismissed her application seeking condonation of delay and, resultantly, the written statement was directed to be taken off the record.
Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 3
Digitally Signed CM(M) 801/2023 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:2 4.09.2024 17:15:32
cited as some medical exigency.
(MANOJ JAIN) JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 23, 2024/st
Signature Not Verified
Page 3 of 3
Digitally Signed CM(M) 801/2023 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:2 4.09.2024 17:15:32
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant an early hearing to a petitioner in a family property suit who filed an application seeking condonation of delay in filing written statement.
Rajesh Kumar Saini
Smt. Neetu Saini
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
