The petitioner's counsel informed the Court that he did not wish to press the petition, noting the petitioner was defending a commercial suit and had filed a counter-claim. The Court disposed of the petition as not pressed while reserving all rights and contentions of the parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~80
DINESH KUMAR BHASIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Choudhary, Advocate
AMIR CHAND THAKRAL .....Respondent Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 12.09.2024
MANOJ JAIN, J
SEPTEMBER 12, 2024/ dr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/09/2024 at 10:57:09
Dinesh Kumar Bhasin
Amir Chand Thakral
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
