The petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition challenging an NCDRC order, praying for liberty to approach the Calcutta High Court. Relying on a Supreme Court judgment regarding territorial jurisdiction in consumer disputes, the Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty.
Withdrawal of petition allowed with liberty to approach Calcutta High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
.....Petitioner
versus
BULA MUKHERJEE & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)
CM APPL. 53155/2024 & CM(M) 1570/2023
CM(M) 1570/2023 1
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 2.09.2024 15:46:10
Mookerjee vs. Madhab Chand Mitter , Civil Appeal Nos. 3915-16/2024, learned counsel for petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court situated at Calcutta.
(MANOJ JAIN)
JUDGE
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024/ss
Signature Not Verified
CM(M) 1570/2023 2
Digitally Signed By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Da te:1 2.09.2024 15:46:10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Delhi High Court has jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition challenging an NCDRC order based on a cause of action arising in West Bengal?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Siddhartha Mookerjee vs. Madhab Chand MitterReferred¶19
Siddhartha Mookerjee vs. Madhab Chand Mitter , Civil Appeal Nos. 3915-16/2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kanchan Singh
Bula Mukherjee
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
