Petitioner filed revision petitions against appointment of Local Commissioner. The court disposed of the petitions as infructuous since the Trial Court had allowed withdrawal of underlying suits due to amicable settlement between parties, rendering the relief sought unnecessary.
The petitions were disposed of as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35 & 36
CM(M) 2770/2024 & CM(M) 2789/2024 1
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:17:14
the parties, learned Trial Court has already permitted the plaintiffs to withdraw their respective suits. Statements of the plaintiffs have also been recorded separately to the aforesaid effect.
MANOJ JAIN, J
NOVEMBER 5, 2024/dr
CM(M) 2770/2024 & CM(M) 2789/2024 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:17:14
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petitions survive after the withdrawal of the underlying suits due to an amicable settlement.
Usha Rani
Bhupinder Sharma
Usha Rani Rohilla
Jai Kumar
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
