Petitioner challenged trial court orders appointing a Local Commissioner in two suits. After amicable settlement, the plaintiffs withdrew their suits with the trial court's permission, so the High Court disposed of both petitions as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35 & 36
CM(M) 2770/2024 & CM(M) 2789/2024 1
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:17:16
the parties, learned Trial Court has already permitted the plaintiffs to withdraw their respective suits. Statements of the plaintiffs have also been recorded separately to the aforesaid effect.
MANOJ JAIN, J
NOVEMBER 5, 2024/dr
CM(M) 2770/2024 & CM(M) 2789/2024 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 03:17:16
Usha Rani
Bhupinder Sharma
Usha Rani Rohilla
Jai Kumar
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
