Petitioner under Article 227 challenged dismissal of his Order IX Rule 7 and Section 8(1) Arbitration Act applications in a commercial suit. Counsel sought withdrawal due to technical defects; permission granted with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
SHRI SURENDER SINGH SETHI ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Michael Peter, Adv.
versus
SMT. RANJANA BHASIN & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R % 12.02.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:00:34
SHALINDER KAUR, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2024 /ss
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:00:34
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Shri Surender Singh Sethi
Smt. Ranjana Bhasin & Ors.
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
