The court disposed of an application for enlargement of time for the Trial Court to decide an appeal, finding no further orders necessary as the matter was listed for disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
Through: Mr. J. K. Bhola, Mr. Siddharth Khurana and Mr. Shashank Kumar, Advs.
versus
SHRI VIKAS SHARMA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Gurmehar S. Sistani, Ms. Natasha Thakur and Mr. Samit Khosla, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R % 08.04.2024
CM APPL. 20771/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/04/2024 at 12:18:06
SHALINDER KAUR, J
APRIL 8, 2024 SU
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/04/2024 at 12:18:06
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SUNITA SHARMA & ORS.
SHRI VIKAS SHARMA & ANR.
SHALINDER KAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
