The petitioner moved the court for permission to withdraw his petition because it had become infructuous. The High Court of Delhi granted the request and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
MASTER SARTHAK KAUSHIK THROUGH HIS MOTHER ANU
BHARADWAJ ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Ms. Renu, Ms. Anjani Mishra, Mr. Aditya and Mr. Kailash Kumar Jha, Advs.
versus
ABHINAV KAUSHIK ..... Respondent
Through: Respondent in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R % 08.01.2024
SHALINDER KAUR, J.
JANUARY 08, 2024 /ss
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 12:14:57
Master Sarthak Kaushik
Anu Bharadwaj
Abhinav Kaushik
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
